"I cannot accept your canon that we are to judge Pope and King unlike other men, with a favourable presumption that they did no wrong. If there is any presumption it is the other way against holders of power, increasing as the power increases. Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility. Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority: still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority."
- Acton-Creighton Correspondence (1887)
https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/acton-acton-creighton-correspondence
Is it weird that in so many fields, the result of the application of power is filtering and refinement from its natural state - skimming off the unwanted dross. Yet running power through any human, bringing imperfections to light, is expected by some to bring up no dross? As if a humans natural state is somehow pure?